| Wildlife and Nature Books Online in Association with Amazon.com |    |
|
|
|
| Power and Plenty: Trade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium (Princeton Economic History of the Western World) | 
| Authors: Ronald Findlay, Kevin H. O'rourke
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Category: Book
List Price: $39.50
Buy New: $27.36
You Save: $12.14 (31%)
New (24) from $27.36
Avg. Customer Rating:  7 reviews
Sales Rank: 21724
Media: Hardcover
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 624
Shipping Weight (lbs): 2.4
Dimensions (in): 9.3 x 6.3 x 1.7
ISBN: 069111854X
Dewey Decimal Number: 382.09
EAN: 9780691118543
ASIN: 069111854X
Publication Date: November 12, 2007
Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping
Promotion: Save $5.00 when you spend $25.00 or more on Qualifying Items offered by Amazon.com. Enter code BMLSAVES at checkout. Terms and Conditions
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
International trade has shaped the modern world, yet until now no single book has been available for both economists and general readers that traces the history of the international economy from its earliest beginnings to the present day. Power and Plenty fills this gap, providing the first full account of world trade and development over the course of the last millennium. Ronald Findlay and Kevin O'Rourke examine the successive waves of globalization and "deglobalization" that have occurred during the past thousand years, looking closely at the technological and political causes behind these long-term trends. They show how the expansion and contraction of the world economy has been directly tied to the two-way interplay of trade and geopolitics, and how war and peace have been critical determinants of international trade over the very long run. The story they tell is sweeping in scope, one that links the emergence of the Western economies with economic and political developments throughout Eurasia centuries ago. Drawing extensively upon empirical evidence and informing their systematic analysis with insights from contemporary economic theory, Findlay and O'Rourke demonstrate the close interrelationships of trade and warfare, the mutual interdependence of the world's different regions, and the crucial role these factors have played in explaining modern economic growth. Power and Plenty is a must-read for anyone seeking to understand the origins of today's international economy, the forces that continue to shape it, and the economic and political challenges confronting policymakers in the twenty-first century.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 2 more reviews...
 Keeping it short and sweet July 13, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This book is to be bought for the first 7 and a half chapters. It's a solid 4 star rating then. The topic is simply too broad for any single volume book to get 5 stars. In other words, this is a readable bibliography. It doesn't always handle the sources well, so truly, use it as a bibliography!
The reduction to three stars is entirely based on that the authors completely dropped the ball on colonialization. How it was formed, what role it played in the local economy, how force was used, and how it buttressed the world economy, these were all missing, or had one line apologetic acknowledgements. It led to charts that show how the Belgian Congo and French West Africa were some of the fastest expanding economies in the world, when most people reading this are going to be familiar with Joseph Conrad's opus. There were other highly autistic use of data when it refers to the colonial states. The relunctance to frankly deal with colonialism impacted the book from the latter half of the seventh chapter on. Lastly, perhaps related, or unrelated, some of the fairly critical events of the latter half of the 20th century but in the Third World, like the debt crisis of the 1970s, the iranian revolution and war with Iraq, the Mexican Peso Crisis, and the 1997 asian finacial crisis all apparently merited little or no mention. Anyone reading this book by itself is going to be somewhat misinformed without something on third world (and Marxist--it was pretty thin there as well) economic history.
It is a good book, just understand that the typical Western Triumphalist outlook starts peaking out towards the end.
 Comprehensive review suitable for the layperson June 14, 2008
I should note that although I do not have a background in economics, I might be the perfect layperson for this book as I do have a degree in history. I understand probably about as much economic theory as most semi-educated people, and hopefully a little more history. For the most part, I could follow along the economic arguments, although a few theoretical points required some review. However, there were quite a few parts where I was glad that I already knew which historic events they referred to, because sometimes they made a mention of it and then simply moved on. The most obvious was the second world war and the Holocaust, although it could be reasonably argued that most (semi-educated) people are pretty well-versed in the most basic facts of that conflict.
That would be my only complaint about this book, and as I said, one that didn't negatively affect my enjoyment of it. The book opens with a survey of where the major and minor geo-political players were at the beginning of the Second Millenium. Yes, we all know that the area roughly referred to as the Middle East made the rest of the world look like barbarians at the time (and yes, pun intended), but the authors still do a good job of impressing the reader with the vast scope of their economic activities. However, they also show that other areas, particularly East Asia but even Western Europe, were more sophisticated than they are usually given credit for. What is most valuable though is the explanation of the interactions all of the regions had with each other. Although the Middle East had the most far-reaching and complex and Europe the fewest, the total picture makes it clear that on balance the world at the beginning of the Second Millenium was much more connected than most people realize. One of the major themes of the story is not just the effect of political jockeying on trade but also the ebb and flow of the interconnections between the regions of the world.
The discussion on the effects of the Black Plague/Black Death was the one that felt the most appropriate for an economics textbook. This section was very dependent upon a number of graphs and seemed to use the most economic theory. I expected subsequent sections to be in the same vein, but the scope seemed to get bigger afterwards, for lack of a better word.
The importance of taxes and free trade- as well as the economic advantage that slavery provided to slave holders (a practice they repeatedly condemn)- were important themes in the book. However, the climax of the story as the authors see it is the Industrial Revolution, and this subject got the most ink out of any in the book. A "conspiracy" of politics, history, the clear need for certain innovations and, most importantly, the special relationship between England and the sparsely populated United States puts the center of the Industrial Revolution in Britain, but its presence and influence soon spread well beyond. The most important aspect of this economic phenomenon, and what makes it revolutionary, is that it enables its participants to break away from the Malthusian model that ties standard of living to population density. The subsequent, dramatic rise in the standard of living- and the expectation of such high standards- is probably what is most responsible for continued economic and political innovations.
As much as the Industrial Revolution raised the bar and showed what was possible, the First World War and the Interwar period show, perhaps, how fragile our systems were and how interconnected they were to politics and the peculiar balance of power that existed worldwide between 1815 and 1914. Although the United States and parts of Western Europe found ways to take advantage of the new political opportunities, the authors convincingly argue that the rest of the world did not truly recover until the end of the 20th century.
At the end of the book, the authors draw parallels to both the Germany before the First World War and Japan before the Second. The authors imply that at least some of their belligerence may have been justified by the repeated attempts by established players (Great Britain and the United States) to block their access to favorable trading conditions. The authors see an analogous potential in both China and India, who are seemingly suddenly viable participants on the verge not only matching the US' capacity but exceeding it, and countries with newer nuclear capability. We are left to ponder if we can learn from the lessons of history- and what that lesson might be.
Globalisation? The imparative of attitude chane of country leaders May 25, 2008
This book is like a six layer cake with as layers the periods 1000-1500, 1500 to 1650, 1650 to 1780, 1780 to 1814, 1914 to 1939, 1939 to 2007, and speculations about the future. Within each layer you find descriptions of what happened in seven regions that is Western Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa with Southwest Asia, Central or Inner Asia, South Asia, and South East Asia. For each region you find wars, rulers, economic development including trade. And, especially important, the interaction and interdependence between regions
This is about as holistic, systematic and complex presentation you can ever hope to find. By the way the development of North and South America is included in Western Europe and Africa as it relates to other regions. The book is an outstanding example of a multidisciplinary approach combining the science of history with the science of economics. The book is written by an Irish and American professor. You can see from the choice of regions that it is not a European centric presentation. Asia dominated with many regions in year 1000 at the start and is moving to domination in 2007.
You will learn about many examples of interconnectedness you did not know about. For example the industrial revolution in the UK would never have happened as a consequence of only steam power and mechanisation in cotton spinning and weaving. It was dependent on a rapid increasing supply of low cost cotton that was produced to almost 100% by slave labour in the Americas, continuous land grabbing in the Americas, military control of the seas by the UK Navy to transport the cotton to the UK and transporting cotton cloth for export and an industrial policy of protection of the UK cotton industry from foreign competition in the UK. You will also find many examples of causes of unforeseeable change. Just as an example consider the rapid expansion of population and wealth during the Song dynasty in China. That was made possible by the introduction of a different type of rice from what is now Vietnam that allowed three harvests per year.
The book demonstrates conclusively that major changes in the fortunes of countries' history cannot be understood without economics and wars and the other way around. It is disappointing even frightening to see how personal greed and greed by nations has been the driving factor of most of the major changes Concern for the well-being of others as a driving force is almost totally absent.
That should be a lesson for the future. When the increasing interdependence between nations is combined with greed as the driving force, disaster is likely to occur. A disaster that can as yet can not be identified. Governments were never were able to predict disasters in time in the past. That means that it is imperative that country leaders have to change their mind - sets and consider the well-being of other countries next to their own. Anybody reading this book will become convinced of this is an absolute necessity.
Fine Overview and Synthesis; 4.5 Stars May 17, 2008
5 out of 5 found this review helpful
This well written book is a successful effort to summarize and synthesize a large secondary literature on the history of international trade over the last millenium. The authors adopt a chronological approach starting at 1000 CE and conclude with the recent re-emergence of the high degree of global trade in the last half century. The first chapter offers an overview and methodological discussion. Chapter 2, which stresses the economic importance and sophistication of the Islamic world and China, reconstructs the state of the Eurasian international economy. Chapter 3 describes the positive effects of the emergence of the Mongol Empire with its great facilitation of trans-Eurasian trade, followed by wholesale transformation of the Eurasian world by the consequent Black Death and its various sequealae. Chapter 4 describes the European voyages around Africa and the beginning of the integration of the Western Hemisphere into the Eurasian, now world economy. This is all very well done and the authors do a good job of summarizing the significant secondary literature on these topics with a nicely critical approach to the often fragmentary data. The emphasis, throughout, is on the interaction of economics and political history. Much of this, however, will be familiar to those with a good knowledge of history.
The authors really hit their stride and introduce a significant level of analysis with Chapter 5, which discusses European Mercantilism, and the succeeding chapters. The higher level of description and analysis is probably due to the availability of more complete data, particularly for European trade and economic performance. Chapter 6, on the Industrial Revolution, is a very thoughtful discussion of the literature on the origins of the Industrial Revolution in Britain, concluding with a sophisticated multifactorial description of the emergence of the first Industrial economy. The authors do a very nice job of stressing contingent features and the role of political and social history. The subsequent chapters, on the 19th century economy, the disatrous effects of the World Wars and the re-emergence of a high degree of global trade in the last half century, are excellent.
The quality of writing is quite good, the authors are careful to avoid using a lot of economics technical language, though a basic knowledge of economics is very helpful in reading this book, and the bibliography is comprehensive. Unlike many historians, and like many economists, the authors make good use of charts and graphs. It would have been helpful to have a few overview figures summarizing trade flows during the different periods discussed by the authors.
 Genghis Khan at the Root of Globalization February 18, 2008
4 out of 4 found this review helpful
Ronald Findlay and Kevin O'Rourke demonstrate with much detail how trade, war, and peace have closely interacted with each other in the last millennium. Findlay and O'Rourke clearly show how three apparently unrelated events, i.e., the Black Death of the 14th century C.E. and its different impact on several regions of the world, the integration of the New World into that of the Old at the turn of the 16th century C.E., and the Industrial Revolution at the turn of the 19th century C.E., have shaped the world as we know it today. Thankfully, Findlay and O'Rourke have compiled the existing research to allow their audience to better understand the close interaction that exists between Power and Plenty. To summarize, Findlay and O'Rourke's demanding volume clearly does not target readers who have a short attention span, do not acknowledge the importance of the past to peruse the future, lack persistence, or are interested in simplistic answers to complex issues.
|
|
|
Wildlife, nature and the Environment
Sponsored Links
Learn how to get your own Amazon Book shop | |
|
