|
| The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science | 
| Author: Natalie Angier
Creator: Nike Doukas
Publisher: HighBridge Company
Category: Book
List Price: $39.95
Buy New: $12.25
You Save: $27.70 (69%)
New (22) from $12.25
Avg. Customer Rating:  76 reviews
Sales Rank: 383747
Format: Audiobook, Unabridged
Media: Audio CD
Edition: Unabridged
Number Of Items: 11
Pages: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.6
Dimensions (in): 5.9 x 5.1 x 1.2
ISBN: 1598870890
Dewey Decimal Number: 500
EAN: 9781598870893
ASIN: 1598870890
Publication Date: April 20, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: New - Never Opened - In the Factory Wrap
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
A playful, passionate, ebullient guide to the science all around us by a Pulitzer Prize winner and best-selling author.
Buckle up for a joy ride through physics, chemistry, biology, geology, and astronomy. Drawing on conversations with hundreds of the world's top scientists and her own work as an award-winning science writer, Natalie Angier does the impossible: She makes science fascinating and seriously fun, even for those of us who, in Angier's words, "still can't tell the difference between a proton, a photon, and a moron."
Most of the profound questions we will explore in our lives—evolution, global warming, stem cells—have to do with science. So do a lot of everyday things, like our ice cream melting and our coffee getting cold and our vacuum cleaner running (or not). What does our liver do when we eat a caramel? How does the horse demonstrate evolution at work? Are we really made of stardust? (Yes, we are.)
In The Canon, Lewis Thomas meets Lewis Carroll in a book destined to become a modern classic—because it quenches our curiosity, sparks our interest in the world around us, reignites our childhood delight in discovering how things work, and instantly makes us smarter.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 71 more reviews...
 Thanks, Natalie.... October 7, 2008
The process of reading this book reminded me of a story I once heard in which Claire Booth Luce was asked if she like to write. "No," she replied, "but I like having written." Reading 'The Canon' was a lot like that: it was sometimes tough going, but I liked having read it. No one ever said science was easy, but with a little effort an attempt to understand the basics behind Physics, Chemistry, and the other branches of science can make living in the world a richer experience.
I am grateful to Natalie Angier - one of my favorite columnists - for the 'whirligig tour' of the basics of science in one fairly slim volume. And to sweeten the pill a bit, she has injected her signature wit, which I enjoy so much in her columns.
I particularly appreciated the chapter on probabilities: once, on a plane, I sat next to a gentleman who claimed to have been in three different airplane accidents. At the time, I questioned his sanity; having read the chapter on probabilities, I now think it was entirely possible.
The world is an amazing place. It is worth taking time to try to understand it.
 Basic? It most certainly is not! September 15, 2008
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
After reading the torturous "Canon" I can honestly say that it was the most terrible book I have ever read. Angier promises to help the common man understand the "beautiful basics of science", and there was nothing "beautiful" or "basic" about this book. Throughtout the reading, I was confused and lost on what Angier was speaking about. Many of the references went right over my head and I had to read sections 3-4 times in order to fully grasp what she was trying to say. In addition, Angier never fully expressed what she wanted to say and instead hid it behind a "joke", which wasn't very funny anyway. To the future buyer: run far, far away and do not purchase this book, it was a complete waste of money.
A Fine Introduction To The Major Areas of Science August 9, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Sometimes the best explainers of a topic are outsiders or laymen, rather than practitioners in the field. The author isn't a scientist so she can still see complex topics from the layman's viewpoint. This is, simply put, a great book. It covers not only the nuts and bolts of science (what is the doppler effect?) but the philosophy behind science (why does the scientific method do such a good job at explaining our world?)
The writing is breezy and not stilted, using metaphors instead of math to explain difficult topics. The chapter on evolutionary biology is my favorite, and covers not only the mechanics of evolution but the controversy, and explains the tenets (and bad reasoning) of the Intelligent Design movement. After reading this chapter it seemed like a veil lifted from my eyes, and I got excited and yelled, "I get it!"
A couple of my favorite quotes:
From the chapter on evolutionary biology: "Natural selection is the force that transforms drift and randomness into the gift of extravagance. It takes the doctrinaire sloth of the second law of thermodynamics, the tendency of every system to get frowzier over time, and hammers it into a magic, all-purpose, purpose-making machine that turns around and breaks entropy at the knees."
From the chapter on astronomy, talking about the search for extraterrestrials: "We are such indefatigable telecommunicators that the world and its 6.5 billion content providers don't feel like enough, and we can't help but wonder, Who else can we call?"
The book is wonderful and definitely is worth reading several times. My only gripes: there is the occasional reference to some current pop culture celebrity, and I think this will make an otherwise timeless book seem dated in a few years. Also I think that the book would have been enhanced by an occasional illustration. For instance, the explanation of the galaxies flying away from each other is much easier understood if you actually see a picture of a balloon with dots on it to represent the galaxies.
 This canon needs another en August 5, 2008
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
Natalie Angier was mad as heck and wanted some science to go wring a neck. That of her sister, who saw no need, for muse-seeums now that her children were ready for new sceneums. So she wrote and she wrote and came up with a book that should have captured the basics of science in a new look. Alas Natalie spent a lot of time writing about subjects obscure in order to educate the masses toujours.
Too clever by half, she got most of it right, but her writing got in the way- 'twas too trite. Bombeckian prose over and over again, makes for wrinkled nose, over and over again. And over and over again. And again. Every page, sometimes ten.
Not a total waste of time, some good basic science, but at the end of the day, a writing style of annoyance. Add to it some comments that are way too PC, and you have a half a book, not a great one, you see.
Frippery city August 4, 2008
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
Think of chocolate cake dipped in honey, sprinkled with powdered sugar and then drizzled with maple syrup. Blech!
Apparently, Angier has noted that the world of nonfiction has had to make due without its own version of E. Annie Proulx, and decided to fill that gap herself. (This is not a compliment.)
But I hate to be hard on her, because she is performing a real service, and obviously is quite bright and more than willing to dive into a tough subject and work until she understands it. But if her stated goal is to make the basics of science more accessible to people, why make us read in dread of the next strained metaphor or lame pun? It's hideously distracting.
(For the record, you can't really address a compendium of basic science without mentioning J. Willard Gibbs, America's greatest and most obscure science titan.)
|
|
|
Wildlife, nature and the Environment
Sponsored Links
Learn how to get your own Amazon Book shop | |
