Wildlife and Nature Books Online in Association with Amazon.com
Wildlife and Nature Books OnlineShop in UK CurrencyWildlife Search Engine
Search Advanced Search
 Location:  Home » Books » General » Silent Spring  
Silent Spring
Silent Spring
Author: Rachel L. Carson
Publisher: Houghton Mifflin
Category: Book

Buy Used: $4.76



Collectible (17) from $29.95

Avg. Customer Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars 136 reviews
Sales Rank: 953041

Media: Hardcover
Pages: 368

ISBN: 0395075068
EAN: 9780395075067
ASIN: B00005WUN0

Publication Date: January 1, 1962
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Students use expedited shipping! Absolutely no shipping to prisons!! Amazon default shipping is 1 to 4 weeks for US. Use expedited if need sooner. HI,AK,VI,PR,Guam, Saipan must use expedited shipping. #ds(con=al) #ds(low=$0.01) #ds(min=$1.00)

Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 16-20 of 136
 « PREV  
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
... 28   NEXT »

5 out of 5 stars Can you believe people are still disbelieving after 40 years!?   September 16, 2006
 6 out of 17 found this review helpful

It certainly doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that whatever "inputs" we put into a system (Earth, humans, water, air, etc.), will in turn impact the system and the systems "outputs." If we put poison into the soil, air, and water, we will ultimately re-ingest these materials and create a toxic environment that will be unable to support the system that we are purportedly trying to save. Do the logic yourself. What kind of logic is it that would say that malaria deaths justify the use of DDT? We have no idea of how many millions, or billions, of people globally have been impacted by its use in the forms of debilitating illnesses and death from cancer and the like. With this false rationale, just as in the current debate over the use and subsequent output of carbon materials, we are again showing our naivete in believing that we can put a "technological" fix on an issue that is better addressed by the way we live and consume. So, we save all these poor souls from malaria, but then we give them a planet that is poisonous? Nonsensical at best.


5 out of 5 stars Very Informative   May 14, 2006
 2 out of 7 found this review helpful

Although this book was published more than 40 years ago, it's still worth a read. I found it interesting, informative and disturbing. Although I know DDT has been banned, I can't help but worry about some of the lasting effects of it and other chemicals used as pesticides or insecticides.


1 out of 5 stars A misguided mass killer   April 28, 2006
 33 out of 105 found this review helpful

Before this misguided book was published, DDT was successfully reducing malaria deaths across the globe. After it, and the subsequent ban on DDT, millions of people have suffered and died needlessly. For example, in Sri Lanka in 1948, there were 2.8 million malaria cases and 7,300 malaria deaths. With widespread DDT use, malaria cases fell to 17 and no deaths in 1963. After DDT use was discontinued, Sri Lankan malaria cases rose to 2.5 million in the years 1968 and 1969, and the disease remains a killer in Sri Lanka today.

Carson' science is dodgy, her conclusions false and her prescriptions plain wrong. Do not buy this book



5 out of 5 stars Rachel Carson was right   April 18, 2006
 23 out of 31 found this review helpful

When Silent Spring was first published I was a young chemist working for a chemical company in Philadelphia. I remember well how she was engaged in a TV debate with one of the big guns from one of the major manufacturers of insecticides. I thought she handled herself very well then and for the remainder of her life while she endured withering attacks from vested interests and people who want to live in a dream world. To the people who say she caused the deaths of millions because she stopped the use of DDT, you didn't read the book! Mosquito resistance to DDT is easily developed and its continued use will lead to mosquitos of greater resistance. It may be true there are application methods for DDT that are relatively safe for protection against various mosquito borne diseases but she did not cause them to be outlawed. Even though the Government screws up often,it does ocasionally makes fact based decisions that are correct. If DDT is outlawed, it is because the facts dictate it, not Rachel Carson.
For those misinformed souls who think DDT is not toxic, you lie or you have been lied to. Just goggle "DDT toxicity" and you will find out what a danger this chemical really is.

Her science is sound. After 44 years, her book is still worth a read. Much progress has been made to protect our environment. This book has played an important part in making this happen.







4 out of 5 stars Why should I read this book?   April 17, 2006
 7 out of 12 found this review helpful

Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" was the impetus that brought about the environmental movement as we know it today. Her unparalleled research, during 1962, exposed and condemned the use of DDT and ADT as forms of chemical pesticides and insecticides. The book provides shocking evidence and anecdotes of the affects of contamination, which often lead to death. Her stories and evidence was shocking because it not only opened the eyes of millions Americans to the carcinogens they were eating daily, but it opened up an entirely different area of environmental science. No long was it limited to preservation, such as the Sierra Club, but now the idea that humans have a negative impact on the environment.
I believe Carson wrote this book as a wake up call to the American Public. After observing a "Silent Spring", in which no birds chirped or bugs buzzed, she dug deeper into the extent at which these chemicals were being used. She was compelled to do research and write this book because she wanted people to know what havoc these chemicals were having on the earth.
If you are interested in environmental science I feel this book is a great tool for learning where environmental history begins, a lot of it begins with this book. If Carson hadn't written this book, then the use of DDT and ADT would still be in effect today. That thought alone would provide us with a much different future, in both a negative and positive light, because while DDT and ADT were bad, we have to this day, not found equivalent replacements that are as effective.


Wildlife, nature and the Environment

Sponsored Links

Wildlife

Discover Wildlife using our Google Wildlife Search

Learn how to get your own Amazon Book shop