|
| Batman Begins | 
| Category: Movie
This item is no longer available
Avg. Customer Rating:  1178 reviews
Sales Rank: 501
Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Media: Video Download
Running Time: 141 minutes
ASIN: B0014D6PCO
Theatrical Release Date: June 15, 2005
Release Date: August 4, 2008 (New: Last 30 Days)
|
| Customer Reviews:
 The cinema audience applauded at the end !!! June 16, 2005
4 out of 6 found this review helpful
The best movie adaptation of batman ever made.I found the film realistic, believable and human. Actually I did not want it to end.
I'm so funkin' excited about this flick I wrote a song 4 it! June 16, 2005
3 out of 6 found this review helpful
Here's the link---> audiostreet.net/phatsk8traxjentaki76
The song is called BATMAN BEGINS (2 get FUNKED UP!)
Check it out & holla back with any comments!
This flick is going 2 be awesome!
Enjoyable from start to finish June 16, 2005
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
Not to worry! "Batman Begins" is nowhere near the trainwrecks that were "Batman Forever" and "Batman & Robin" .. aside from Katie Holmes (a poor choice for the character of Rachel Dawes), this movie is enjoyable from start to finish!
This movie is dark, gripping, and action-packed. The acting is OK for the most part, as is the plot, of course. Aside from a few dodgy scenes (including the death of the parents and when Batman confronts some fat villain-esq type character), this movie's filled with style and substance and will have you keeping your eyes glued to the screen.
Morgan Freeman, thankfully, is tolerable in this movie and fits nicely into his role. Nothing over-done, nothing small. Just right.
But surely the biggest flaw of this movie is the fact that Katie Holmes was cast(ed) as the leading-lady. This woman gives us a C-grade performance and somewhat de-rails this movie's potential. I say they should've gone with a stunning blonde or brunette who knew how to act well -- and who could've had actual chemistry with The Caped Crusader. Katie Holmes seems all right when she first appears, but ultimately she's D.O.A. and I'm not happy she was put in this film.
This film's not campy. At all. It has some good dialogue and some pretty sharp/ace lines. This film's a lot darker than its predecessors and it's more intense.
Christian Bale made for a decent Batman. He's a finer pick than Val Kilmer and George Clooney.
Oh, and the ending leads us to think that there's room for a sequel. Hopefully we'll get one in 07/08.
It was well worth paying $5 to see this movie in the theatre.
..Oh, and how creepy was The Scarecrow?! ..Ugh. I might just have nightmares! Awesome villain in this one!
 terrible June 16, 2005
5 out of 59 found this review helpful
positives:
1 christian bale is the best batman to date
2 morgan freeman is in it
negatives:
1 the movie is from start to finish: horrible
2 no plot
3 once again, they throw in a couple of bat-villains in poor undeveloped fashion
4 katie holmes is fuggly
5 morgan freeman is too smart to be in movies like this
6 you have to pay at this point to see this movie...wait until it graces the rarefied air of hbo and you'll thank me because you can change the channel to underwaterbasketweavingweaveoff2005 or just go to sleep in your la-z-boy (anything is better than this snooze fest)
seriously though i can't believe how bad this movie was
shockingly bad June 16, 2005
5 out of 49 found this review helpful
i would never have imagined in a million years with all the supposed tlc focused on this flick, that it could have been this poor. it's outrageously bad. the plot...wait what plot? when you see ninjas jumping around closing ranks on bruce, and if you don't fall asleep after the first hour or so...you'll get to 'enjoy' the same disjointed plotless cra#$est that i unfortunately paid to see.
AVOID
|
|
|
Wildlife, nature and the Environment
Sponsored Links
Learn how to get your own Amazon Book shop | |
