|
| Silent Spring (Edition 001) | 
| Author: Rachel Carson
Creators: Edward O. Wilson, Linda Lear
Publisher: Mariner Books
Category: Book
List Price: $14.95
Buy Used: $1.00
You Save: $13.95 (93%)
New (69) Collectible (7) from $5.08
Avg. Customer Rating:  137 reviews
Sales Rank: 4510
Format: Special Edition
Media: Paperback
Edition: 104
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 400
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 8.1 x 5.4 x 0.9
ISBN: 0618249060
Dewey Decimal Number: 363.7384
UPC: 046442249065
EAN: 9780618249060
ASIN: 0618249060
Publication Date: October 22, 2002
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Over 600,000 Feedbacks Posted!!! Great Buy!!!*** Never Used*** May Have a Publisher's Mark~We have over 3,500,000 Books Sold!!!
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Al Gore surely loves this March 26, 2007
12 out of 95 found this review helpful
Hurrah for "sustainability" and "biodiversity"! Down with the human race!
 classic February 19, 2007
9 out of 14 found this review helpful
We needed more than 30 years to understand that Rachel Carson was not an alarmist. This prophetic book about our environment is very well written.
What would DDT opponents say if mosquitoes carried HIV instead of malaria? February 18, 2007
29 out of 68 found this review helpful
I've seen many reviewers argue that the use of DDT to prevent malaria deaths in the developing world is unjustified because 1) it may cause greater long-term harm to the environment, and 2) mosquitoes will eventually develop resistance to the insecticide.
One San Francisco reviewer even claimed "We have no idea of how many millions, or billions, of people globally have been impacted by its use in the forms of debilitating illnesses and death from cancer and the like." According to her, it's irresponsible to use DDT when we have no idea to what extent the negative impact, if any (although "billions of people" is a bit ridiculous), is of using it.
But there's no question what the negative impact has been of banning it: millions and millions of preventable deaths. So some environmentalists are apparently more than happy to allow an absolute--millions dead--in exchange for an unknown.
Part of the reason why it's so easy for them to trade lives for theory is that they don't give much day to day thought about malaria. It's a disease that doesn't worry people in the developed world. It happens "over there" in the third world, and if we actually get it over here, well, no worries--we get treated and fully cured with relatively affordable drugs. Who in the West actually worries day to day about dying from malaria contracted from a mosquito bite? It ranks up there with polio and typhoid.
But what would the "ban DDT no matter what the cost" environmentalists be saying if HIV suddenly became transmittable by mosquitoes? Would they continue to argue "we have no idea how many millions of people have been impacted by DDT's use" if they were one mosquito bite away from a death sentence with no cure (as peoples of the third world don't have or can't afford a cure for malaria)?
Nope, you can bet your bottom dollar virtually every one of them would change their tune pretty quickly--especially here in San Francisco. All their objections about "long term damage to the environment" and "resistance to insecticide" would suddenly transform into a mere theory once faced with the possibility their own lives could be in mortal danger. Activists would be storming the streets demanding the return of DDT with the same vengeance they exhibit today when marching for a solution to HIV/AIDS. Because it's a different story when it's no longer someone else's life that's on the line.
And hence we would have an even clearer expression of the hypocrisy of the new environmental imperialism they impose on the third world today--the kind that makes activists feel better about themselves from the comfort of latte studios and Volvo station wagons. Every day they tell the third world "we have cures for these diseases that you don't, so it matters not to us that our environmental crusade will take away your line of defense and you die by the millions" in exchange for good conversation at Starbucks. It's an easy trade when mosquito-borne death isn't tugging at *your* arm every day.
Silent Spring by Pachel Carson January 10, 2007
8 out of 15 found this review helpful
Rachel created a saga of facts about what damage we have done with insecticides and herbicides throughout the US without any thought to the environment or ourselves. She showed in this book our many errors in judgement and backs everything up with facts. She also tells about some new ideas(back then they were new)that would fix some of our "bug" problems but not with chemicals that will ultimately hurt people. Too bad it took so long for us to START paying attention to what she wrote so many years ago.
 Review for Silent Spring January 3, 2007
4 out of 7 found this review helpful
This book was written in 1962 and was the first to introduce the dangers of DDT and other pesticides. This book systematically reveals realistic statistics of the effects of pesticides worldwide. Examples from pesticide control in Europe, Asia, and the US expose the impacts of human actions on nature. Rachel Carson pioneers in describing the impact of pesticides in all parts of nature. In response to the harmful disadvantages to chemical pesticides, Carson offers biological controls which have succeeded in maintaining pests. Though Silent Spring is factual, it is repetative at times. It also emotionally describes environmental aspects. However, Silent Spring is indeed an eye-opening book which allows one to see the impacts of humans and pesticides.
|
|
|
Wildlife, nature and the Environment
Sponsored Links
Learn how to get your own Amazon Book shop | |
